Does The U.s. Need Tougher Gun-control Laws

Pros and Cons of Gun Control Laws in the US

Since completing academy, Paul has worked every bit a librarian, instructor, and freelance author. Built-in in the Great britain, he currently lives in Florida.

This article looks at the positives and negatives of gun control.

Public domain prototype via Pixabay

This article contains a listing of the main arguments for and confronting gun command laws in the USA. The outcome of gun control has been intensely debated in the USA over the years.

The discussion never fully goes away and is ofttimes reignited by outbursts of gun violence by crazed individuals, such as the Virginia Tech shootings, the attack on U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords, or the Sandy Hook Elementary Schoolhouse shootings.

Some of the arguments over gun control reflect practical concerns, such equally issues of cocky-defense and violent criminal offense, some reverberate values and traditions, and others are more legalistic in nature and revolve around different interpretations of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.

Here are the essential pros and cons of gun control laws.

This battle for 'common-sense' gun control laws pits emotion and passion against logic and reason. All besides often in such a competition, logic loses. Then, expect more meaningless, if non harmful, 'gun command' legislation. Good news - if you're a crook.

— Larry Elder

half-dozen Pros of Gun Control

The main argument for gun command is that information technology would reduce trigger-happy criminal offense and shootings, specially in urban areas. Guns make it much easier to impale people. As well as killing others, guns also make information technology easier for people to commit suicide and kill themselves.
The 'Self-defence' argument in favor of guns is ofttimes used against gun control laws, but research suggests that guns in the habitation are far more than likely to kill a friend or a household fellow member, than an intruder.
The collective self-defense argument that the United states of america needs militia groups to protect the country from the threat of invasion are spurious, to say the least, given the power of the US military. Some amateur militia groups within the The states, who are answerable to no ane, are actually more than potentially unsafe than foreign powers.
At that place are ethical arguments as to why the 2nd Amendment is not absolute. Basically, no right is absolute if information technology clashes with other rights. For example, even the right to free spoken communication is restricted if you lot accuse a public effigy of disreputable behavior, when yous know this to exist false. Neither are yous immune to shout "Burn down!" in a crowded theater when you lot know there is no danger.
There are too legal arguments regarding the 2d Amendment's statement on the correct to comport arms. For instance, "The people" who are referred to in the Second Amendment are a group who class function of a "well-regulated" militia. It essentially asserts a state'southward right to take a militia and does non mean that every private citizen has the correct to bear artillery.
There are likewise questions regarding where to describe the line with regard to private armaments. Guns were the predominant weapon at the time of the American Revolution, just nowadays we have bazookas, plastic explosives, bomber aircraft, and tanks—should any private citizen be allowed to ain those items besides?

Police arriving at the Sandy Hook Elementary School after 20 children and 6 adult staff members were shot by 20-year-old Adam Lanza. Proponents of gun control believe that there needs to be more regulation of gun sales and ownership. — Police arriving at the Sandy Hook Elementary Schoolhouse after 20 children and half-dozen adult staff members were shot by twenty-yr-old Adam Lanza. Proponents of gun command believe that there needs to be more regulation of gun sales and buying.

Public domain image via Wikimedia Commons

Every bit for gun control advocates, I have no promise whatever that whatever facts whatever will make the slightest dent in their thinking - or lack of thinking.

— Thomas Sowell

7 Cons of Gun Command

Gun buying is a fundamental civil right, irrespective of the Us Constitution. All other arguments regarding gun ownership are therefore irrelevant.
The 2d Amendment to the U.s.a. Constitution clearly guarantees the correct to possess firearms by individual citizens, the people who dispute this are misinterpreting the US Constitution. This correct has been upheld by the courts on many occasions.
Gun possession by individuals is vital for legitimate purposes such as self-defense and hunting and should not exist interfered with by the authorities.
Guns can deter criminals and reduce crime without ever being used.
Gun ownership acts every bit an "equalizer" for women, who are then able to deter or defend against attacks past stronger, more than aggressive men.
Gun ownership by both individuals and militias provide security for the American people against foreign invasion and as well government tyranny—if the American people were disarmed and some kind of dictatorship emerged, the people would be at its mercy.
If gun employ is restricted, so criminals and murderers volition only utilise unlike weapons, such as knives.

Scroll to Continue

Your opinion

This content is authentic and true to the all-time of the writer'southward noesis and is not meant to substitute for formal and individualized communication from a qualified professional person.

Questions & Answers

Question: I'm doing a contend for my history class, and I was a picayune confused about the Second Amendment and what information technology says well-nigh militias. Tin can you explicate this?

Respond: The exact diction of the Second Amendment is "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free Land, the right of the people to keep and acquit Arms, shall not be infringed."

Constitutional lawyers, politicians, and ordinary people have all argued about the relationship of militias to the right to bear arms in the statement. Militias were a common manner of organizing a fighting force during the time of the revolution.